Most assessment reports speak the publisher's language. Yours should speak your competency language. Bring us your framework. We map it to the assessments already on Podium, build a report engine that writes the way your organisation talks about people, and switch it on inside your own platform.
Typically live within three to four weeks. You pay for the credits. Above 5,000 credits, the build is on us.
| Scale | Low | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | High | Sten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor A | Reserved | Outgoing | 7 | |
| Factor E | Deferential | Dominant | 9 | |
| Factor F | Serious | Lively | 6 | |
| Factor G | Expedient | Rule conscious | 3 | |
| Factor M | Practical | Abstract | 7 | |
| Factor Q1 | Traditional | Open to change | 8 | |
| Factor Q3 | Tolerates disorder | Perfectionistic | 4 |
The respondent's sten 9 on Factor E suggests a forceful, assertive interpersonal style, which, combined with a sten 3 on Factor G, may indicate a preference for expedient over rule governed approaches. Readers should consider these results alongside the second order factors on page 7...
One page with the whole picture. The five competencies are the ones Northwind uses for commercial roles, read against a large working population.
You tend to spot an opening early and move on it, and to keep pushing until it closes. Energy and initiative are likely to be visible in how you sell.
Illustrative. "Northwind Medical" is a fictional organisation; competency names, bands, colours and page structure are yours to define.
A custom report meant a large publisher, a six figure budget and months of lead time, so only the largest organisations ever had one. Three things have changed, and together they put a truly bespoke report within reach of a 500 person company.
Knowing which scales measure "commercial acumen" in your context, and writing narrative that holds up in front of a candidate, a hiring panel or a works council. That is psychologist's work, and it is what we do.
Scoring logic, bands and narrative blocks are built as components. Your report is assembled from them and tuned to your framework, so the build takes weeks rather than quarters, without the cost of starting from nothing.
Our engines deploy directly into the Podium platform. Your report appears inside your own environment, linked to the assessments, visible only to you, and your team runs it with the credits they would buy anyway.
A competency model, a leadership framework, a set of values, or just the question you keep asking about people. Any shape is fine.
We map each element to the scales that measure it, across GCAT, PQ10, the Resilience Profile, Derailers, 15FQ+ and the rest of the catalogue, and tell you plainly what cannot be measured.
Scoring logic, bands and narrative in your language. Deterministic, every line written by a psychologist, with the evidence behind each statement.
A small group runs the assessment. You read the reports and tell us where the language lands and where it does not. We adjust.
Switched on in your Podium environment, linked to the assessments, for your organisation only. Your certified team runs it from day one.
Typically three to four weeks from receiving your framework to the report being live. The platform step takes days; the time goes into the mapping, the writing and the validation.
Every custom report is assembled from proven page types and tuned to your framework. A typical feedback report runs to twelve or thirteen pages. These are the ones clients ask for most.
Your competencies scored against the working population, with the agility grid beneath. One page, the whole picture.
One card per competency: the score, a plain verdict, your definition in your words, and narrative that explains how it shows up.
Motivation read separately from capability: what makes the effort feel worth it, and what will land flat.
How readily the person learns and grows, across thinking, people and self. Optional, and the most requested add-on.
Which strengths tip over under sustained stress, kept separate from the competency scores and never used as a verdict.
Four things to do with the report, a reflection prompt and, for selection, the interview questions the profile raises.
Selection reports add a readiness read, a pre-interview brief and a 90-day onboarding plan. Development reports add the agility toolkit and a personal plan.
Every competency in your framework is backed by specific scales from validated instruments, and the report shows that chain. A hiring manager reads "Leading change: Solid" and can see exactly which measures produced it.
Where a competency cannot be measured psychometrically, say domain knowledge or a technical certification, we say so and leave it to the interview, rather than inventing a score. That honesty is what makes the report defensible.
Hover a competency to see what feeds it.
Illustrative mapping. Your framework, your weightings, your bands.
Buyers ask three questions before they commit to a custom report. Here are the answers, in writing.
Assessment usage on Podium is credit based, so the real cost of your programme is the credits your team uses, and those you would buy anyway. Order 5,000 credits or more and the report build is included. Below that, a modest build fee applies.
We quote after a short scoping call, once we have seen your framework.
You have a competency model your managers know, you run assessments in house or want to, and you are tired of reports that need translating. Your report arrives in your language, in your platform, for your team to run.
Your method, your brand, our engine behind it. We built the Agility Quotient platform this way for Hydrogen Group and Argyll Scott, and it is live in market today.
Yes. You bring your competency model, leadership framework or values. We map each element to the scales that measure it, build a report engine that writes in your language, and deploy it inside your own Podium environment. Where something cannot be measured psychometrically, we say so rather than pretend.
Typically three to four weeks from receiving your framework to the report being live. The platform step takes days; the time goes into mapping, writing the narrative and validating it on a pilot group.
Usage is credit based. With an order of 5,000 credits or more the build is on us. Below that a modest build fee applies. We quote after a short scoping call.
You own your framework and all your assessment data. The engine, algorithm and narrative library are the Studio's and are licensed to you. Only your organisation can access your report.
No. Scoring is deterministic and every narrative line is authored by occupational psychologists. AI tools speed up our build process; they never score a person or write their report. That matters when reports support hiring decisions under the EU AI Act.